Debunking Why Creationism is Real Science by Antonio DeAguiar

The original text from Antonio can be found here:
https://plus.google.com/collection/IsMnCB

”Genesis chapter 2 verse 7
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.”

Yeah, quoting the Bible is not science.

”All the raw elements that humans are made from are found on Planet Earth.”

Jupp…

”The human body consists of cells made
of 65-90% water by weight making the human body’s mass of mostly oxygen followed by Carbon which refutes biological evolution if the Earth had the alleged reducing atmosphere without Oxygen. The mass of the human body is made up of mostly six elements: 65% Oxygen, 18% Carbon, 10% Hydrogen, 3% Nitrogen, 1.5% Calcium, 1.0% Phosphorus. The balance of elements is shown for you to read.”

Jupp…

”As humans can be resuscitated by mouth to mouth ventilation; God pushed the first breath of life into the lifeless trillions of microorganisms which was the lifeless corpse of Adam that God intelligently made from raw elements to make him a living being.”

And the EVIDENCE for this CLAIM is what? No one is arguing that if this hypothetical god exists, he could have done this. But Anonio needs to provide evidence both that this god exists, and that he actually DID do this.

”Nucleic Acids, DNA and RNA, are made of Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen and hydrogen. This disproves the notion of an early reducing atmosphere. Oxygen is essential to the Nucleic Acids”

No it is not, Adenine – C5H5N5 = (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen) is the first base nucleotide, Only adenine is required to make the amino acid ”Lysine”. Lysine is an α-amino acid that is used in the biosynthesis of proteins.
This video explains chemical evolution and how it works:

”but oxygen would prevent the materialistic notion of the chance assembly of cellular life.”

Oxygen in earths atmosphere is created by cyanobacteria, so, life on earth came before Oxygen.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/origin-of-oxygen-in-atmosphere/

”Proteins cannot evolve
Douglas Axe Explains Molecular Evolution
http://sandwalk.blogspot.se/2012/09/douglas-axe-explains-molecular-evolution.html”

This is what Douglas Axe says:
”… So, really, you put all that together, we now understand something about digitally-encoded information in cells, encoded in the genome. We understand why it’s there: to encode proteins. And we understand how the proteins function to do the chemistry of life. And we also have the ability to measure, to some degree, how much information is there. If you put all that together, we now see something that looks very much like human designs, where we use digitally-encoded information to accomplish things, and we know that it’s impossible to get information on that scale through a chance process that Darwinism employed.

This is false. We don’t ”know” any such thing. Axe cannot point to a single paper in the peer-reviewed literature that correctly explains why one can’t ”get information on that scale through a chance process that Darwinism employed”. This is just something that creationists repeat over and over again without real justification.
http://recursed.blogspot.se/2013/03/doug-axe-doesnt-understand-information.html

”Glory to God/Yahweh, the one who causes all things to be.
Their hearts are darkened, and their minds are shut, and the theirs ears are dull, and their eyes are dim that they can’t know or understand or heed or appreciate all the evidence that only supports God and His Worldview. They cannot and will not be able to present evidence to the contrary. This is why they can only lie and suppress the truth, Real Science.
Read Romans 1:18-32 YOU ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE COME JUDGMENT DAY.”

This god, JHVH, do some AWFUL things in the Bible, really not the kind of being you want to worship:

Matthew 19:12 says it is OK to shop of your penis to keep you from sinning.

Genesis 38. God kills Judah’s son, so Judah tells his other son to have sex with his dead son’s wife. However, he ”pulls out”, which god did not like, so god kills him. So the wife disguises herself as a prostitute and have sex with Judah (her father in law) instead. This incest baby is an ancestor of Jesus. (Judah btw wanted to burn her alive until he finds out he is the baby daddy).

2 Samuel 12:11-12
God orders the gang-rape of David’s wife (with an audience), then David orders that the girls must be sent to lifetime in prison for being raped.

Deuteronomy 22:13-21
If a father cannot prove his daughter is a virgin (by presenting bloody sheats), she may be stoned to death.

Exodus 4:24
If you have a foreskin, you deserve to die.

Esther 12:17
David selects his wife trough an involuntary sex-contest.

1 Samuel 18:25
David buys a woman for 200 foreskins.

”The Deep Time Lie concocted by the atheists that evolutionism needs is yet again falsified by the empirical evidence of side by side Uranium 238 and Polonium 210 Radiohalos in metamorphic granite that demonstrate over 100 million years of decay measure at today’s rate happening in just a few days.”

Polonium forms from the alpha decay of radon, which is one of the decay products of uranium. Since radon is a gas, it can migrate through small cracks in the minerals. The fact that polonium haloes are found only associated with uranium (the parent mineral for producing radon) supports this conclusion, as does the fact that such haloes are commonly found along cracks (Brawley 1992; Wakefield 1998).

”Noah’s 3 sons and daughter-in-law’s had to repopulate the earth [Gen. 9:18-19] 18 Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark [on the Mountains of Ararat, modern day Turkey] were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. 19 These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated] the genetic analysis of the male Y chromosome confirms a recent Adam via Noah of all males. ”

The Y-chromosomal Adam is the most recent common ancestor from whom all currently living people are descended patrilineally. The title of ”Y-chromosomal Adam” is not permanently fixed to a single individual, and shifts over time as human inheritance and our knowledge of human ancestry changes. The current Y-chromosomal Adam is estimated to have lived 200,000 to 300,000 years ago.

It is sort of funny that someone denying evolution, would argue that all the different ethnicities have a common ancestor. It is also funny, that someone would use an example that requires the human race to be at least 200 000 years old whilest claiming the human race 6000 years old.

”There are three main lineages of Mitochondrial DNA: dubbed by Evolutionists as Haplogroups “M”, “N” and “R” which are nicely corresponding to the three wives of Noah’s three sons and have very little mutational difference between each other that confirms the short period from the creation of Adam and Eve about 1056 years before the flood of Noah.”

Once again, these are not referring to one person… The ”mitochondrial Eve,” to which this claim refers, is the most recent common female ancestor, not the original female ancestor. There would have been other humans living earlier and at the same time. The mtDNA lineages of other women contemporary with her eventually died out. Mitochondrial Eve was merely the youngest common ancestor of all today’s mtDNA. She may not even have been human.
The same principles find that the most recent human male common ancestor (”Y-chromosome Adam”) lived an estimated 84,000 years after the ”mitochondrial Eve” and also came from Africa (Hawkes 2000; Underhill et al. 2000; Yuehai et al. 2001).
The results assume negligible paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA, but that assumption has been called into question. Male mtDNA resides in the tail of the sperm; the tail usually does not enter the egg that the sperm fertilizes, but rarely a little bit does. It is also possible that there is some recombination of mtDNA between lineages, which would also affect the results (Awadalla et al. 1999; Eyre-Walker et al. 1999). But these challenges have themselves been questioned (Kivisild et al. 2000).
”on the linear rate of “rapid speciation” since the Global Flood using the actual MtDNA change rates for animals and humans which nicely confirms a genetic bottleneck for all extant creatures that are descendants of the few representative Kinds at the taxonomic level of Family in most cases that God sent to the Ark for survival by being on the Ark and those off the Ark for the marine kinds.”

The interesting thing with believing this, is that if Noah had to bring all kinds, that is, around 7000 according to answers in genesis, and we have around 16 million species today if we are very restricted in our definitions (so at least 16 millions), that is like 4 new species a year! THAT, is rapid evolution.

”Intrinsic Radiocarbon in all the alleged ancient material falsifies the deep time claims of the atheistic pseudoscience of Evolutionism and Uniformitarianism.”

Already debunked here:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/rate-critique.html

”Radiocarbon is detectable by very accurate instruments in all the alleged ancient material that Evil Evolutionists/Atheists claim according to arbitrary Evolutionary time lines to be more than 60 Million years old.”

Which is explained by contamination from the air..
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/rate-critique.html

”This empirical evidence/data reduces the age of all the alleged ancient materials to much less than 60,000 years since according to the alleged half-life of 5730 years for C14 there should not be a single atom of C14 beyond 60,000 years.”

Well, first of that is explained by contamination, but more importantly, we have MANY radiometric dating methods, and if we get different results with different methods, we do not trust the results, but the assumption usually leanes towards the results that correlates whith each other.

”Intrinsic Radiocarbon is measurable by very accurate instruments [Accelerator Mass Spectrometry] in all these alleged ancient materials in alleged layers that are 100’s of millions of years old i.e. Coal, Bituminous Coal, Coal Tar, Diamonds, Oil, Natural Gas, Marble, Graphite, Foraminifera, Coke, Fossil Wood, Anthracite, Calcite, Whale Bone, Dolomite, Wood, and Dinosaur Fossils. If the Earth was even 60,000 years old not a single atom of C14 would be detected.”

Already debunked here:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/rate-critique.html

”These findings are withheld from the public and were barred from the abstract when presented at the Geophysics meeting this past August 2013.”

So how did Antonio find out about them? Super-advanced spying technology, directly from god?

”The Bible describes two dinosaurs according to eyewitness narrative that dinosaurs co-existed with humans. Recent evidence of soft pliable blood vessels, collagen protein/sequence and blood components found inside a T-Rex bone also confirms a young Earth and the co-existence of humans and dinosaurs as well as the Global Flood catastrophe since the un-mineralized tissue was found that couldn’t survive longer than a few thousand years as confirmed by lab testing.”

The reports of the soft tissue, though remarkable, have been sensationalized further. The tissues were not soft and pliable originally. The tissues were rehydrated in the process of removing the surrounding mineral components of the bone (Schweitzer et al. 2005). Moreover, it is unknown whether the soft tissues are original tissues. Fossil flexible tissues and nucleated cells have been found before in which the original material was not preserved (Stokstad 2005).
The age of fossils is not determined by how well they are preserved, because preservation depends far more on factors other than age. The age of this particular bone was determined from the age of the rocks it was found in, namely, the Hell Creek Formation. This formation has been reliably dated by several independent methods (Dalrymple 2000).
DNA has never been recovered from any dinosaurs nor from anything as old as them, and researchers do not expect to find DNA from these soft tissues (though they can still hope). DNA has been recovered, however, from samples much more than 10,000 years old (Poinar et al. 1998), even more than 300,000 years old (Stokstad 2003; Willerslev et al. 2003). If dinosaur fossils were as young as creationists claim, finding soft tissues in them would not be news, and recovering DNA from them should be easy enough that it would have been done by now.

”Professor of Geology at University College of Swansea Derek Ager (1923–1993) said about the evidence of polystrate fossils:
“… we have allowed ourselves to be brain-washed into avoiding any interpretation of the past that involves extreme and what might be termed ‘catastrophic’ processes…we cannot escape the conclusion that sedimentation was at times very rapid indeed…” Ager, D., The Nature of the Stratigraphical Record, Macmillan, London, pp. 46–47, 1987″

First of all, outdated source. Secondly, it is a quote mine..  You can find the rest of the text here:
https://books.google.se/books?id=6MImr8bzqvYC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=%22cannot+escape+the+conclusion+that+sedimentation+was+at+times+very+rapid+indeed%22&source=bl&ots=EEdScCRi32&sig=dPrp9Bf0HG0GgiHH8whj431UWZs&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj895bxpOHPAhWBCCwKHYMQCiQQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=%22cannot%20escape%20the%20conclusion%20that%20sedimentation%20was%20at%20times%20very%20rapid%20indeed%22&f=false

“[Charles] Lyell also sold geology some snake oil. He convinced geologists that…all past processes acted at their current rates (that is, those observed in historic time)… This extreme gradualism [concocted by Lyell to deliberately silence the historical record in Genesis compiled by Moses] has led to numerous unfortunate consequences, including the rejection of sudden or catastrophic events in the face of positive evidence for them, for no reason other than they were not gradual.”
Allmon, W.D., Director of Paleontological Research Institution in Ithaca, NY, and Adjunct Associate Professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Cornell University. “Post Gradualism”, Science 262(5130):122, October 1993.”

This is just wrong. The reason we have excluded such events as the flood, is that there is no evidence of the flood, and there is also, MASSIVE evidence against it, such as 2 billion cubic kilometers of water missing, and that there is no rock-layer showing global flooding.

Secondly, Charles Lyell is EXTREMELY outdated (he died in 1875).

”The information/instructions/commands in view in biological systems are the SEMANTIC COMMANDS between the Sender and Receiver of the instructions which both must understand. In the Genome Program of Life for every Kind of organism, the Sender is God who used a chemical based medium i.e. A,G,C,T in DNA and inc. U for RNA.”

This is a CLAIM requiring EVIDENCE. Antonio sure likes to claim and guess.

”The Genome Program of life has this code specified by the billions of base pairs that the RECEIVERS which are nano-scaled biological machines that translate and obey the commands that God specified.”

True, except for the ”God-part” which is pure speculation.

”This highly ordered system can’t tolerate noise pollution; it has systems [“blue prints”] to compare to remove errors. Mutations are 100% deleterious or neutral”

Beneficial mutations are commonly observed. They are common enough to be problems in the cases of antibiotic resistance in disease-causing organisms and pesticide resistance in agricultural pests (e.g., Newcomb et al. 1997; these are not merely selection of pre-existing variation.) They can be repeatedly observed in laboratory populations (Wichman et al. 1999). Other examples include the following:

– Mutations have given bacteria the ability to degrade nylon (Prijambada et al. 1995).
– Plant breeders have used mutation breeding to induce mutations and select the beneficial ones (FAO/IAEA 1977).
– Certain mutations in humans confer resistance to AIDS (Dean et al. 1996; Sullivan et al. 2001) or to heart disease (Long 1994; Weisgraber et al. 1983).
– A mutation in humans makes bones strong (Boyden et al. 2002).
– Transposons are common, especially in plants, and help to provide beneficial diversity (Moffat 2000).
– In vitro mutation and selection can be used to evolve substantially improved function of RNA molecules, such as a ribozyme (Wright and Joyce 1997).

– Lactose tolerance – why humans with significant European ancestry can digest milk as adults.
– Antibiotic resistant bacteria – at least beneficial from the point of view of the bacteria.
– Radiation resistant fungi (and perhaps other lifeforms) inside Chernobyl
– ”German Superboy”, an individual example of a human mutation that not only doesn’t cause any visible disfigurement or impairment, but if anything will probably make it easier to maintain a muscular physique and/or low weight. These are characteristics that could be considered desirable in the modern day, when food is abundant.
– The ccr5-Δ32 mutation confers HIV-1 resistance to those with a double copy of the allele (homozygous). The mutation also confers resistance to plague and smallpox while increasing susceptibility to west nile virus.

”and can’t produce semantic commands or specify a program.”

Once again a CLAIM not backed up by EVIDENCE.

”Gene duplication, transposons and polyploidy are methods by which existing semantic commands are utilized and are not the source of Semantic Instructions.”

Once again, a CLAIM not supported by EVIDENCE.

”Information can’t exist without intelligence.”

Once again a CLAIM requiring EVIDENCE.

”Language is not material; it is immaterial.”

Jupp??

”Einstein’s Gulf says materialism cannot cross over to ideas, instruction, emotion, opinion, language. These things can only come from GOD who is the intelligence/being that made humans in his likeness to have these abilities.”

Once again a CLAIM requiring EVIDENCE.

”Chemical reactions are by design as God purposed. What behaves predictably, and purposefully is by design.”

Once again a CLAIM requiring EVIDENCE.

“The origin of the genetic code presents formidable unsolved problems.”

Yes, but unsolved problems does not mean ”god did it”.

”The coded information in the nucleotide sequence is meaningless without the translation machinery, but the specification for this machinery is itself coded in the DNA. Thus without the machinery the information is meaningless, but without the coded information the machinery cannot be produced!”

WE all know there are holes in scientific knowledge. We for example do not know exactly how RNA and DNA first came into existence, this of course only argue one thing: That we do not know, nothing else.

”This presents a paradox of the chicken and egg variety, and attempts to solve it have so far been sterile. “  John C. Walton, (Lecturer in Chemistry, University of St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland), Organization and the Origin of Life, Origins, Vol.4, No.1, 1977, pp.3031.”

True, but that we have not solved in means absolutely nothing. It just means that we do not know. It does not imply god. A few 100 years ago, we did not understand comets, that did not mean they were created by god.

“In molecular biology, various kinds of mutations introduce the equivalent of noise pollution of the original instructive message. Communication theory goes to extraordinary lengths to prevent noise pollution of signals of all kinds. Given this longstanding struggle against noise contamination of meaningful algorithmic messages, it seems curious that the central paradigm of biology today attributes genomic messages themselves solely to noise.” David L. Abel and Jack T. Trevors, “Three Subsets of Sequence Complexity and Their Relevance to Biopolymeric Information,” Theoretical Biology & Medical Modelling, Vol. 2, 11 August 2005, p. 10. (Also available at http://www.tbiomed.com/content/2/1/29.)”

The paper itself contains no data at all — no experiments, measurements, or observations — but it is full of novel acronyms. Apparently, all you need to do to make it as a big time creationist is to make up new words and phrases and string them together. His other papers seems to be impenetrably glib papers full of pretentious acronyms, posing as an expert on biology while saying nothing credible about biology at all. IT is pure pseudoscience providing absolutely no evidence or repeatable tests.

”The basic flaw of all evolutionary views is the origin of the information in living beings.”

Which evolution does not even try to answer. So it is a flaw of evolution, that it does not answer something it is not trying to answer? Evolution tried to answer why there is VARIETY, not the origins of life.

”It has never been shown that a coding system and semantic information could originate by itself in a material medium”

Well, all chemicals are codes in the same way DNA is. Some are more advanced, some are less. Also, that it has never been shown, is no reason to ASSUME the opposite (that intelligence is required).

”and the information theorems predict that this will never be possible. A purely material origin of life is thus precluded.” Gitt, p.124.  Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, 2nd edition (Bielefeld, Germany: CLV, 2000)”

Werner Gitt is a retired German engineer, not an expert on evolution.

”SEMANTIC INFORMATION/COMMANDS IN THE GENOME PROGRAM OF LIFE COULD ONLY COME FROM THE MIND OF GOD”

Antonio keeps claiming so, but does not seem to realize that quoting people out of context, or quoting people that are not experts, is not evidence. No quotes are evidence.

”We would see [in cells] that nearly every feature of our own advanced machines had its analogue in the cell: artificial languages and their decoding systems, memory banks for information storage and retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the automated assembly of parts and components, error fail-safe and proof-reading devices utilized for quality control, assembly processes involving the principle of prefabrication and modular construction. In fact, so deep would be the feeling of deja-vu, so persuasive the analogy, that much of the terminology we would use to describe this fascinating molecular reality would be borrowed from the world of late twentieth-century technology. What we would be witnessing would be an object resembling an immense automated factory, a factory larger than a city and carrying out almost as many unique functions as all the manufacturing activities of man on earth. However, it would be a factory which would have one capacity not equalled in any of our own most advanced machines, for it would be capable of replicating its entire structure within a matter of a few hours. To witness such an act at a magnification of one thousand million times would be an awe-inspiring spectacle. Denton, p.329.”

Once again, this is SPECULATION. It does not put forward any EVIDENCE.

“Biochemical systems are exceedingly complex, so much so that the chance of their being formed through random shufflings of simple organic molecules is exceedingly minute, to a point indeed where it is insensibly different from zero.” Hoyle and Wickramasinghe, p. 3.”

And all experts on the subject, say it was caused by a NON-RANDOM natural process. As soon as you see someone say ”random” when it comes to evolution, you know the person does not know the subject at hand. This is true in this case as well, Wickramasinghe is a mathematician/astronomer (not an expert on the subject)  Fred Hoyle was an astronomer, so, non of them are experts on the subject. Which should be quite obvious since they obviously believe chemists are talking about a random process.

“No matter how large the environment one considers, life cannot have had a random beginning.”

Not True, it is just highly unlikely, but it can have a NATURAL beginning, NATURAL does not mean RANDOM.

”Troops of monkeys thundering away at random on typewriters could not produce the works of Shakespeare, for the practical reason that the whole observable universe is not large enough to contain the necessary monkey hordes, the necessary typewriters, and certainly the waste paper baskets required for the deposition of wrong attempts. The same is true for living material.”  Hoyle and Wickramasinghe, p. 148.”

Richard Dawkins explains why this is a misunderstanding of how evolution works:

“From the beginning of this book we have emphasized the enormous information content of even the simplest living systems. The information cannot in our view be generated by what are often called ‘natural’ processes, as for instance through meteorological and chemical processes occurring at the surface of a lifeless planet. As well as a suitable physical and chemical environment, a large initial store of information was also needed.”

This is a CLAIM, not evidence.

”We have argued that the requisite information came from an ‘intelligence’, the beckoning spectre.”  Hoyle and Wickramasinghe, p. 150.”

Once again, these guys are not experts on biology or chemistry. They are Astronomers and mathematicians.

 “Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make the random concept absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favourable properties of physics on which life depends are in every respect deliberate.”  Hoyle and Wickramasinghe, p. 141.”

Once again, these guys are not experts on biology or chemistry. They are Astronomers and matematichians. Just laypeople on this subject. You may as well ask any random highschool-student.

 
“… there is enough information capacity in a single human cell to store the Encyclopaedia Britannica, all 30 volumes of it, three or four times over. … There is enough storage capacity in the DNA of a single lily seed or a single salamander sperm to store the Encyclopaedia Britannica 60 times over. Some species of the unjustly called ‘primitive’ amoebas have as much information in their DNA as 1,000 Encyclopaedia Britannicas.” Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, pp. 116–117.”

And then he goes on to explain why this is no problem for evolution:
https://books.google.se/books?id=u4d0CgAAQBAJ&pg=PT118&lpg=PT118&dq=there+is+enough+information+capacity+in+a+single+human+cell+to+store+the+Encyclopaedia+Britannica,+all+30+volumes+of+it,+three+or+four+times+over.+…+There+is+++enough+storage+capacity+in+the+DNA+of+a+single+lily+seed+or+a+single+salamander+sperm+to+store+the+Encyclopaedia+Britannica+60+times+over.&source=bl&ots=xLaICmy-HR&sig=WFT6SGCcRE_o3KmGLv4oI4lqi_I&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipnaKlseHPAhVFEywKHfWJApkQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=there%20is%20enough%20information%20capacity%20in%20a%20single%20human%20cell%20to%20store%20the%20Encyclopaedia%20Britannica%2C%20all%2030%20volumes%20of%20it%2C%20three%20or%20four%20times%20over.%20…%20There%20is%20%20%20enough%20storage%20capacity%20in%20the%20DNA%20of%20a%20single%20lily%20seed%20or%20a%20single%20salamander%20sperm%20to%20store%20the%20Encyclopaedia%20Britannica%2060%20times%20over.&f=false

“All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not to increase it.” Lee Spetner, Not by Chance (Brooklyn, New York: The Judaica Press, Inc., 1996), p. 138.”

Lee Spetner is physicist, not an expert on biology or chemistry, a layperson on this subject.

“Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) [so-called junk RNA] have been found to have roles in a great variety of processes, including transcription regulation, chromosome replication, RNA processing and modification, messenger RNA stability and translation, and even protein degradation and translocation. Recent studies indicate that ncRNAs are far more abundant and important than initially imagined.” Gisela Storz, “An Expanding Universe of Noncoding RNAs,” Science, Vol. 296, 17 May 2002, p. 1260.”

OK, so what?

 “The term ‘junk DNA’ is a reflection of our ignorance.”  Gretchen Vogel, “Why Sequence the Junk?” Science, Vol. 291, 16 February 2001, p. 1184.”

OK, so what?

“… non-gene sequences [what evolutionists called ‘junk DNA’] have regulatory roles.” John M. Greally, “Encyclopaedia of Humble DNA,” Nature, Vol. 447, 14 June 2007, p. 782.”

OK, so what?

”The Evolutionary pseudoscientists claim that dentation, the type of teeth, dictates diet and scorn that God originally made all land animals to live on a vegetarian diet. This is silly since it’s the digestion system that extracts the essential nutrients from the food and not teeth or talons.”

And lions, for example, do not have what is necessary to process Mushrooms. So…

”Meet ‘Little Tyke’ the Lioness that would not eat meat or a drop of blood, but grew to a healthy weight on a vegetarian diet. Another such Lioness (Lea) raised in Italy was an Italian pasta lover. Then there’s Dante the vegetable loving cat. Consider the Palm nut vulture with talons and a beak like an eagle but is vegetarian and thrives on Palm nuts.”

Humans can eat gravel, and dirt, it is just not good for us. Little Tyke DIED.
Cats cannot make their own Taurine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurine), and they need it in their diet or they will die young.

”Speaking of the future Kingdom of God to come ruled by Jesus, the returning Messiah, Isaiah 11:6-9  speaks of this restoration 6 “The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, The leopard shall lie down with the young goat, The calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little child shall lead them. 7 The cow and the bear shall graze; Their young ones shall lie down together; And the lion shall eat straw like the ox. 8 The nursing child shall play by the cobra’s hole, And the weaned child shall put his hand in the viper’s den. 9 They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain, For the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord As the waters cover the sea.”

Once again, a Biblical CLAIM with no evidence. Guesses and speculations.

Then comes a list of Hovind-videos. I see no need to debunk them, since that is already done so many times, Talk Origins debunks basically every argument he has on this page:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-yea.html

”Carl Linnaeus (Carl von Linné) May 23, 1707– Jan. 10, 1778  a Swedish Creationist Christian of the 18th century was a Botanist, Physician, and Zoologist who used a binomial nomenclature on the basis of genus & species designation to classify flora and fauna in a hierarchical system that made him the father of modern taxonomy and ecology.
Contrary to evolutionists that have hijacked his work to say otherwise, the nested hierarchical outcome of his analysis best reflects a typology of the flora and fauna of God’s divine plan and not evidence of evolution”

He is several hundred years outdated. Antonio just keeps on CLAIMING things.

”The shared physical characteristics reflect design suited for the environment and purpose and abilities that the Creator God purposed for each kind of organism.”

It LOOKS like that. But the argument from design is debunked hundreds of times. So, I feel no need to do that. Richard Dawkins book ”the blind watchmaker” is probably the most famous one.

”His systemization of the organisms parallels God’s creation account with Kinds due to kingdoms as with birds of the air, aquatic fish and sea monsters, creeping things such as insects and worms, beasts of the fields being the quadrupeds etc. with variation or sorts under each kind as limited by inter-fertile reproduction.
Evolutionism was concocted by evil lying Atheists without any knowledge of DNA/Genetics/Genome without any evidence, logic and without using the scientific method”

Claims, claims, and more claims. Where is the EVIDENCE?

”The Canidae kind is very famous to demonstrate the variation/sub-species of the Biblical Kind; dogs, jackals, dingoes, wolves, foxes, coyotes are inter-fertile confirming that they are of the same Biblical Kind.”

And the ”dog kind” became all of these in just a few thousand years?? That is RAPID evolution you are talking about! With that speed, we would expect to see 4 new species every day.

From   wikipedi .org/wiki/Inter-species_mating
”Fertile canid hybrids occur between coyotes, wolves, dingoes, jackals and domestic dogs.”

Yes, there are cases, so what? They have not drifted very far a part yet.

”By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God”

Faith = Acceptance without evidence. So, what is said here, is that by GUESSING, we ”understand” that the word was made by god.

”Source of Semantic Instructions/Commands in the Genome Program of Life and its corruption since creation.”

Once again a CLAIM with no evidence.

”Semantic instruction/commands are between a sender [God or humans that specify the commands by a communication code utilizing a medium] and the receiver/s [biological machines or electro-mechanical machines such as a PC, PLC etc as an analogy using machines contrived by humans]. Semantic commands/instructions inside every cell is not a prediction of the patently absurd and ridiculous atheistic pseudoscience/notion of materialism/naturalism/evolutionism i.e. the atheistic dogma/philosophy of mindless and lifeless chemical explanations only without a superior intelligence/being we call God.”

Once again a CLAIM with no evidence.

”The semantic commands/instructions in the genome program of life written for every kind of organism were only once specified during the creation week by God.”

Once again a CLAIM with no evidence.

”Genesis 2: 1-4  1 Thus the heavens and the earth, and all the host of them, were finished. 2 And on the seventh day God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done. 3 Then God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because in it He rested from all His work which God had created and made. 4 This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created,…”

Once again a CLAIM with no evidence.

”God establishes the 7 day week with a day of rest, a heritage from God and not based on His planetary ordinance. God creates all that exists from what did not exist before creation, and ended the work of creation and rested from his self-sustaining world. Using the Tablet Theory, God’s  eyewitness account of creation which started with Genesis 1:1 ends with His sign-off  verse Genesis 2:4a  “This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created “

Once again a CLAIM with no evidence.

”Creation had to be within a short period of time to enable the self-sustaining cycles of life that are meshed with the lunar and planetary cycles that govern them. These life cycles are key for the biomass that supports the habitable environment of the Earth and the symbiotic relationships of all life on and in it.”

There is however no evidence for this GUESS.

”The failed Biosphere II experiment proves”

A failed experiment is simply a failed experiment, it proves nothing.
Secondly, in science, evidence INDICATES, nothing is ever proven, it is all about plausibility.

”that unless the Earth’s ecosystem is maintained within important levels continually, biological life will end for the most fragile life forms within days and in weeks  to months for the more hardy.”

Jupp, which is not evidence of god. In fact, why would god make the system fragile to begin with?

”The Strong Anthropic Principal”

Is philosophical, not science.

”Isaiah 45:18
18 For thus says the LORD, Who created the heavens Who is God, Who formed the earth and made it, Who has established it, Who did not create it in vain, Who formed it to be inhabited: “ I am the LORD, and there is no other.”

OK?

”The testable prediction based on God’s claim:”

Ah, finally, some evidence, ooor?

”Because the Earth is uniquely created for life, it will be shown that many innumerable parameters and relationships necessary for life to be possible and sustained in the physical habitable environments will be discovered and that should those parameters be sufficiently changed that life forms will die and or become extinct and will not be replaced. Life is indeed fragile; 90% of the known species of flora and fauna is lost and more are being lost without replacement which falsifies Evolutionism.”

WHAT? Even if all life died, it would not falsify evolution. The rest is just claims. Not evidence. Earth is in fact quite hostile to life, not to talk about 99,9% of the universe. The mass extinctions is a part of evolution theory.

”Some have suggested that there are over 400 parameters necessary for life on Plant Earth, I suggest that it will be discovered that the number of simultaneous finely tuned parameters are much higher that make our Planet Uniquely Habitable.”

So? The universe is immensely big, even if the odds are one in 10 billions, those are GOOD odds considering the size of the universe.

”The Strong Anthropic Principle in Order and Short Duration of Creation. Why does all the evidence support God’s word/claims yet the alleged modern ”Science” fails to accept the truth.”

The reason we do not accept, is that there is absolutely no evidence. The Strong Anthropic Principle is PHILOSOPHY, not SCIENCE.

”The Deep Time Lie concocted by the atheists that evolutionism needs is yet again falsified by the empirical evidence of side by side Uranium 238 and Polonium 210 Radiohalos in metamorphic granite that demonstrate over 100 million years of decay measure at today’s rate happening in just a few days. Thus the radiometric dating game using unverifiable assumptions has this evidence that refutes the assumption of decay rate constancy in history unaffected by any catastrophic events and such causes.”

Polonium forms from the alpha decay of radon, which is one of the decay products of uranium. Since radon is a gas, it can migrate through small cracks in the minerals. The fact that polonium haloes are found only associated with uranium (the parent mineral for producing radon) supports this conclusion, as does the fact that such haloes are commonly found along cracks (Brawley 1992; Wakefield 1998). So, no, it is not evidence of creationism. It is evidence that Antonio has not done his research.

”Biblical kinds that are very closely related were prohibited by God [Leviticus 19:19] in cross-breeding because God knows that it introduces weakness as discovered with hybrids.”

Once again a claim with no evidence. That is, that it is caused by god.

”The Biblical Kind is akin to Family in modern taxonomy but can be below or above this level.”
Making it UNSCIENTIFIC to begin with. Antonio of course says this to be able to move the goalpost.

”We can only speculate about the mechanisms that God used to curtail human life span from nearly 1000 years to 120 years.”

There is no evidence of humans EVERY living past 130.

”The life span decay curve has been linked to genetic entropy which may have been accelerated after the Global Flood that collapsed the protective water canopy shielding solar/cosmic rays.”

Speculation upon speculations… Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome is a creationist anti-evolution book written by geneticist John C. Sanford. The book claims that mutations and natural selection do not account for the information in the human genome and that instead of evolution these mechanisms are causing devolution. It however, puts forward NO EVIDENCE.

”Read http://creation.com/human-genome-decay-and-origin-of-life”

Or, for a stronger source: http://www.disney.com.

”Mutation will cause the death of the species.”

So, HIV immunity and strong bones is bad? Both caused by mutations. Natural selection weeds out bad mutations and keeps the good ones.

”Mutations are causing human intelligence to decrease since the peak when humans were created 6000 years ago.
Crabtree, G. R. 2013. Our Fragile Intellect. Part I. Trends in Genetics. 29 (1): 1-3.
The human genome adds about 60 new mutations to the gene-coding DNA regions each generation. Using this rate Crabtree calculates that “every 20-50 generations we should sustain a mutation in one copy of one of our many ID genes.” … “in the past 3000 years then (~120 generations), each of us should have accumulated at the very least 2.5-6 mutations in ID genes.” Accordingly, the human intellect “perhaps reached a peak 2000-6000 years ago.”
http://www.icr.org/article/7400/”

This is a LIE. The FLYNN EFFECT is documented and means that every generation is a little bit more intelligent than the last.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

”Mitochondrial Eve is genetically confirmed to be about 6500 years old using the actual mutational rates and not the re-scaled version used to fraudulently support deep time.”

The ”mitochondrial Eve,” to which this claim refers, is the most recent common female ancestor, not the original female ancestor. There would have been other humans living earlier and at the same time. The mtDNA lineages of other women contemporary with her eventually died out. Mitochondrial Eve was merely the youngest common ancestor of all today’s mtDNA. She may not even have been human.The same principles find that the most recent human male common ancestor (”Y-chromosome Adam”) lived an estimated 84,000 years after the ”mitochondrial Eve” and also came from Africa (Hawkes 2000; Underhill et al. 2000; Yuehai et al. 2001).The results assume negligible paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA, but that assumption has been called into question. Male mtDNA resides in the tail of the sperm; the tail usually does not enter the egg that the sperm fertilizes, but rarely a little bit does. It is also possible that there is some recombination of mtDNA between lineages, which would also affect the results (Awadalla et al. 1999; Eyre-Walker et al. 1999). But these challenges have themselves been questioned (Kivisild et al. 2000).

”Noah’s 3 sons and daughter-in-law’s had to repopulate the earth [Gen. 9:18-19] 18 Now the sons of Noah who went out of the ark [on the Mountains of Ararat, modern day Turkey] were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. 19 These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated] the genetic analysis of the male Y chromosome confirms a recent Adam via Noah of all males. There are three main lineages of Mitochondrial DNA: dubbed by Evolutionists as Haplogroups “M”, “N” and “R” which are nicely corresponding to the three wives of Noah’s three sons and have very little mutational difference between each other that confirms the short period from the creation of Adam and Eve about 1056 years before the flood of Noah.”

Already answered the last time I debunked Antonio:
https://lmacandrew.wordpress.com/2016/10/16/debunking-the-laughable-age-of-the-universe-by-wild-guesses-and-modern-pseudoscience-by-antonio-deaguiar/

“The origin of the genetic code presents formidable unsolved problems. The coded information in the nucleotide sequence is meaningless without the translation machinery, but the specification for this machinery is itself coded in the DNA. Thus without the machinery the information is meaningless, but without the coded information the machinery cannot be produced! This presents a paradox of the chicken and egg variety, and attempts to solve it have so far been sterile. “  John C. Walton, (Lecturer in Chemistry, University of St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland), Organization and the Origin of Life, Origins, Vol.4, No.1, 1977, pp.3031.”

We all know we have holes in our knowledge. We do not know how DNA came to be exactly, this is not really a problem, a theory does not have to be a 100% complete.

 
”The basic flaw of all evolutionary views is the origin of the information in living beings. It has never been shown that a coding system and semantic information could originate by itself in a material medium, and the information theorems predict that this will never be possible. A purely material origin of life is thus precluded.” Gitt, p.124.  Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, 2nd edition (Bielefeld, Germany: CLV, 2000)”
SEMANTIC INFORMATION/COMMANDS IN THE GENOME PROGRAM OF LIFE COULD ONLY COME FROM THE MIND OF GOD”

We can see already in the first sentence that this is bullshit. Evolution has no view on the origins of life, it is a whole other field. Also, this is an ARGUMENT. Arguments are never evidence.

”Life only comes from Life, the parental life form and not from nonlife, nor does intelligence come from the unintelligent, nor does Design/Contrivance without the Designer/Contriver, nor does morality from what is amoral, nor does sexual reproduction from non-sexual reproduction, and so on to refute Evolutionism.”

So, Claim without evidence, + a few more claims without evidence = Evolution is refuted. Strong arguing here!

Antonio keeps saying that intelligence is needed, but provides no evidence.

”Global Warming/Cooling or Climate Change:
Greenhouse gases are normal. Humans and animals breathe out the “greenhouse gas”, Carbon Dioxide [CO2], and pass flatulent, methane, another more potent greenhouse gas. Therefore, 7 billion people and an unknown amount of animals breathing every few seconds and passing gas are normal and essential to life. Declaring CO2 a pollutant is patently absurd. The fact of the matter is that Global Warming and Climate Change are normal. The Climate Changes with the Seasons and Solar Flare cycles etc.”

Sure it is normal. That does not mean that humans do not play a part in speeding it up or that the effects will not be catastrophical.

 ”What is the ideological agenda/propaganda of the Global Warming and Climate Change agenda?”

To warn people…

”Dangerous pseudoscience exists wherever an Ideology i.e. Philosophical Materialism/Naturalism, Uniformitarian Geology, and Evolutionism is trying to rule over Empirical Science.”

According to basically all scientists, evolution IS empirical science. Antonio needs EVIDENCE to change that.

https://answersingenesis.org/environmental-science/climate-change/globe-is-warming-but-its-not-your-fault/”

LOL, sure, of course Global warming is not our fault, it is not like we are polluting!

”All claims of climate change due to very recent and very limited human activity is rubbish.”

Of course letting tons of pollution out in our atmosphere is completely safe! Antonio says so!

”Climate Change/Global Warming is normal since the Ice Age about 4000 years”

Normal yes, but not in this speed.

”ago and is powered by only one heat source i.e. our SUN.”

IF it was only the sun, shouldn’t earths temperature be constant?

”There is no other heat source capable of the glacial melt and subsequent sea level rise of about 130 Meters.”

The sun is not enough at this range. Green house gases KEEPS the heat on earth, THAT is the problem (unless you live where I live, then you say GOOOO global warming).

”The high energy density of fossil fuels is needed to power air travel, freight of products/food, etc.”

Yes, but they also ruing the planet.

”There are no climate change scientists that have been monitoring the climate change for 4000 or more years.”

No need, we can see what climate there was a billion years ago by looking at geology amongs other sciences.

”All scientist are born not knowing anything from birth and learn for other humans born ignorant.”

We TEST things in nature, we do not just tell eachother stuff in science.

”Spencer plagiarized God”

You need to prove god exist to claim that.

”Mendel’s laws of genetics with modern-day refinements explain almost all physical variations occurring within species.”

They are a part of the theory of evolution.

”Genes, the units of heredity, are reshuffled from one generation to another in new combinations, but not different genes.”

Yet Antonio has been speaking about gene-duplication earlier on, which produces new genes and adds information.

”The different combinations produce variations within each kind of life, as in the canidae kind.”

Jupp, but Antonio provides no evidence that there is a limit to the level of change.

”The logical consequence of Mendel’s laws is that there are limits to such variation.”

No, that is just a lie.

”Breeding experiments and common observations also confirm these boundaries as set by God.”

They confirm the opposite. WE have observed speciation. There is no evidence that there is a barrier. So, no, just, no..

”all that are inter-fertile whether naturally or by artificial breeding including sterile offspring confirm the Biblical claim that they reproduce after their Kind with sorts/sub-species. The Law of Biogenesis and Mendelian Genetics also confirm God’s claims/Design.”

So 2 laws that are a part of evolution-theory, disproves evolution? AHA… Logical.. Secondly, all offsprings do not become infertile when interbreeding.

“Every series of breeding experiments that has ever taken place has established a finite limit to breeding possibilities.” Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong (New Haven, Connecticut: Ticknor and Fields, 1982), p. 55.”

That is not what experiments such as the long term e-koli experiments shows us, no.

”Speciation is not Evolution.”

Antonio claims so, however, every single expert on the subject say he is wrong. So we have a choice, trust all experts, or trus Antonio knows better than them all.

”Evolution from pond scum to all that ever lived never happened historically and thus has no forensic evidence or eyewitnesses, defies scientific laws and principles and therefore, cannot be studied and cannot be reproduced as required by the scientific method.”

Debunked in my last post
https://lmacandrew.wordpress.com/2016/10/16/debunking-the-laughable-age-of-the-universe-by-wild-guesses-and-modern-pseudoscience-by-antonio-deaguiar/

”Shares the John pedelton video.”

John Pendelton is not a biologist or a chemist, he is a hired actor.

STOP LYING EVIL LYING ATHEIST.
Biological Evolutionism Never Happened [7 Statements Evolutionists can’t answer and prove otherwise]”
Biological Evolutionism from the alleged common ancestor of all spontaneously generating aka abiogenesis in Pond Scum [Darwin’s warm pools of water with chemicals etc.] that then allegedly transmuted aka Macro-evolved into all the life forms that ever lived as fraudulently depicted in phylogenetic trees:
1- never happened historically,”

CLAIM with no evidence.

”2- thus cannot have eyewitnesses,”

So, we start with the conclusion? I though it would be more logical to start with observations instead of the conclusion ”evolution is not true, therefore, there cannot be evidence”.

We can argue against Antonio with the same logic: Since the Bible is not true, there can be no evidence of it…

”3- and thus left no forensic evidence,”

”Evolution is not true, therefore, there cannot be evidence”, Antonio ones again starts with the conclusion.

”4- and therefore, was never studied as it allegedly happened,”

”Evolution is not true, therefore, there cannot be evidence”, Antonio ones again starts with the conclusion.

”5- defies scientific laws and principles,”

No, the law of biogenesis DOES NOT say that chemicals cannot bind to become more advanced (abiogenesis), and the laws of thermodynamics does NOT apply to earth, since earth is not an isolated system.

”6- and therefore, cannot be reproduced materialistically.”

”Evolution is not true, therefore, there cannot be evidence”, Antonio ones again starts with the conclusion.

”7- This makes Pond Scum to all that ever lived Evolutionism,:”

CLAIM, not evidence.

”a- an atheistic myth concocted by reprobate atheists,”

Actually, mostly by Christians.

”b- not even a working hypothesis much less a scientific theory,”

PRACTICALLY used.

”c- the religion of the atheist,”

Once again, mainly CHRISTIANS.

”d- force fed to KIDS/PUBLIC as an alleged FACT using evidence hijacked by atheists with pseudoscientific claims /LIES/Hoaxes/Fraudulent claims and fraudulent/fabricated evidence

That is true with all school subjects. WE force them to learn what evidence has shown us so far.. IF they turn out to be wrong, we teach them the new facts.

”What are and how are/were fossils made?
Fossils are things encased in rock/stone/mud/amber/ash etc. To encase a fossil of soft tissue flora or fauna or tracks and swimming tracks in rock, rapid burial by mineral rich water borne sediment is needed without subsequent disturbance by environmental erosion and requires the death of living organisms that could dig them out or find them to scavenged them i.e. bioturbation of all types must be prevented as occurred with the Global Flood of Noah.”

Such a flood could have caused fossils, yes. There is just no evidence of such a flood ever happening. In fact, 2 billion cubic  kilometers water are missing for it to even be considered.

”The Global fossils in the Global Fossiliferous Sedimentary Layers by the trillions are formed by the Global Flood of Noah as God purposed when He wanted to destroy the Earth and all land dwelling air-breathing creatures.”

A CLAIM without evidence, once again…

”This Global watery catastrophe trapped/buried dead or dying flora and fauna suddenly by many layers of mineral rich water borne sediment which were not subsequently scavenged by animals/insects/bacteria etc. to eliminate the flora and fauna.”

The big questions here for creationists, is: Why didn’t one single animal try to swim, but instead ordered themselves according to biological advancement.

”Fossils are not made by evolution or Uniformitarian Geology”

No one claims they are.

”and thus are not evidence of Evolution or a chronological history of evolution over deep time.”

Logical fallacy, your premise does not match your conclusion. That evolution does not make fossils, does not imply that fossils are not evidence of evolution.

”This is self-evident using the Law of cause and effect.”

LOL, no, this has nothing to do with cause and effect. Even if evolution cannot caused fossils, fossils can still be evidence of evolution.

”Furthermore, there were ZERO transitional forms when Darwin needed/expected innumerable evidence in the fossil record and there are ZERO transitional forms 150 years later after more than 250,000 cataloged fossils in the intervening years showing no evolution/chance and only stasis.”

Yes there are:
Nautiloidea, Bactritida, Ammonoidea, Cephalopods, Pohlsepia, Proteroctopus,

Vampyronassa, Palaeoctopus
Rhyniognatha, Rhyniella, Archimylacris, Aphthoroblattina, Archaeolepis,
Lepidopteran, Melittosphex, Sphecomyrma
Eophyllium, Protoclaviger, Attercopus, Eoplectreurys, Pikaia, Conodont,
Haikouichthys, Arandaspis
Birkenia, Guiyu, Chondrichthyes, Cladoselache, Dalpiazia, Cyclobatis,
Andreolepis, Amphistium, Eobothus,
Leptolepis, Anguillavus, Hippocampus sarmaticus, Hippocampus slovenicus,
Nardovelifer, Eomola, Corydoras revelatus, Ruffoichthys, Palaeoperca,
Trachicaranx, Histionotophorus, Eolactoria, Proaracana, Gazolaichthys,
Psettopsis, Pasaichthys, Eozanclus, Cretatriacanthus, Nardoichthys,
Protozeus, Archaeozeus, Cooyoo,
Protriacanthus, Osteolepis, Eusthenopteron, Panderichthys, Tiktaalik,
Elginerpeton, Ventastega, Acanthostega, Ichthyostega, Hynerpeton,
Tulerpeton, Pederpes, Eryops, Gerobatrachus, Triadobatrachus, Prosalirus,
Vieraella, Eocaecilia, Proterogyrinus, Limnoscelis, Tseajaia, Westlothiana,
Solenodonsaurus, Casineria, Hylonomus, Paleothyris, Odontochelys, Proganochelys, Eileanchelys, Eupodophis, Najash, Anqingosaurus,
Dallasaurus, Palaeosaniwa, Gangiguana, Cretaceogekko, Darwinopterus,
Pterorhynchus, Proterosuchus, Marasuchus, Asilisaurus, Spondylosoma,
Eoraptor, Pisanosaurus, Thecodontosaurus, Huayangosaurus, Stenopelix,
Yinlong, Guanlong, Falcarius, Scelidosaurus, Probactrosaurus,
Pelecanimimus, Juravenator, Pedopenna, Anchiornis, Archaeopteryx,
Confuciusornis, Eoalulavis, Ichthyornis, Waimanu, Elornis, Colymboides,
Mopsitta, Masillaraptor, Primapus, Protoclepsydrops, Archaeothyris,
Haptodus, Dimetrodon, Biarmosuchus, Cynognathus, Thrinaxodon, Morganucodon,
Yanoconodon, Kollikodon, Djarthia, Eritherium,Miacis,  Heteroprox,
Eotragus,Protylopus, Hyrachyus,  Heptodon, Hesperocyon, Eurymylus,
Onychonycteris, Purgatorius, Sivapithecus, Kenyapotamus, Eomanis,
Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Kutchicetus, Artiocetus, Dorudon, Aetiocetus,
Basilosaurus, Eurhinodelphis, Mammalodon, Pezosiren, Prorastomus,
Protosiren, Eotheroides, Halitherium, Puijila, Potamotherium, Enaliarctos,
Hyracotherium, Mesohippus, Parahippus, Merychippus, Pliohippus, Equus,
Apidium, Aegyptopithecus, Proconsul, Pierolapithecus, Ardipithecus,
Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo rhodesiensis.

”The reason that there ZERO forensic evidence from Pond scum to all evolutionism is because it never happened”

Once again, Antonio starts with the conclusion. Real science looks at evidence, and then draw conclusion, Antonio starts with the conclusion that evolution never happened, and therefore draws the conclusion that there cannot be evidence. We can do that with anything. ”Christianity is not true, therefore, there are no evidence in the Bible”.

”Fossilized Swimming Tracks of floating dinosaurs tiptoeing in mineral rich sediment are evidence of the Global Flood of Noah”

It may as well prove that there used to be a lake at that spot that has dried out. Or a LOCAL flood. No one is denying that floods happen.

”Mineralized fossils include incomplete mineralization as with the soft pliable tissue in the T-rex bone found by Schweitzer.
“Schweitzer answered the challenge by testing with antibodies.  Her report in 2009 confirmed the presence of collagen and other proteins that bacteria do not make.  Also in 2009, the team of Dr. Phil Wilby discovered a fossilized squid that contained a sack of ink so well-preserved that it could be used in a pen for writing, found in rock that is considered to be 150 million years old.  In 2011, a Swedish team found soft tissue and biomolecules in the bones of another creature from the time of the dinosaurs, a Mosasaur, which was a giant lizard that swam in shallow ocean waters.  Schweitzer herself wonders why these materials are preserved when all the models say they should be degraded.”

This is explained though, by the fossils being encased in Zink and other metals. Such encasing can cause basically limitless preservation.

“The discovery of collagen in a Tyrannosaurus-Rex dinosaur femur bone was reported in the journal SCIENCE.  This is an outstanding find because collagen, being a soft tissue present in most animals, is supposed to decay in a few thousand years.”

UNLESS incased in Zink or similar. A more interesting thing here, is that science magazines puts forward everything, even things that points in a new direction. Creationism, would NEVER put forward ANYTHING that did not correleate with the Bible.

”When fossils are hijacked as the alleged evidence for Pond Scum to all evolutionism it is done fallaciously for the following reasons:
a- spontaneous generation aka abiogenesis does not make fossils.”

Which in no way argues against EVOLUTION (since evolution starts when life is already present), also, even if evolution or abiogenesis does not make fossils, fossils may still be evidence of them. One does not exclude the other.

”b- natural selection does not make fossils.”

True, every evolutionist agree. This changes nothing when it comes to the science surrounding evolution though. All evolutionists agree that Evolution, abiogenesis, or natural selection, does not make fossils.

”c- descent with modification does not make fossils.”

Agree… But fossils can still be evidence of decent with modification. One does not exclude the other.

”d- rare deleterious mutations do not make fossils”

Once again, true.

”e- Just-so atheistic, Darwinian storytelling and Lamarckistic notions/ideas/stories do not make fossils.”

True. So, now Antonio have said 5 things that all evolutionists agree to.

Thus under the Law of Cause and Effect, all of the above is not the cause of the global fossiliferous sedimentary layers enveloping the planet as one consolidated rock without bioturbation and with trillions of fossils of flora and fauna including fossil fuels.
HENCE FOSSIL ARE NOT EVIDENCE OF POND SCUM TO ALL EVOLUTIONISM WHICH IS ONLY ATHEISTIC LIES/PSEUDOSCIENCE AND IMAGINED.”

LOGICAL FALLACY, your premise does not match your conclusion. That Evolution does not make fossils, does not mean that fossils cannot be evidence of evolution.

Annonser

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s